In which case is working memory for movements affected by verbal interference? Evidence from the verbal description of movement.

Xie T, Wang L, Wang T.

DOI: 10.1080/09658211.2021.1944217
Published: 2021-06-21
Container: Memory
Publisher: Not recorded
Open access: no

Credibility signals

limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility. Source: DOAJ; license: CC0
not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1080/09658211.2021.1944217,
  title = {In which case is working memory for movements affected by verbal interference? Evidence from the verbal description of movement.},
  author = {Xie T and  Wang L and  Wang T.},
  year = {2021},
  journal = {Memory},
  doi = {10.1080/09658211.2021.1944217},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2021.1944217}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - In which case is working memory for movements affected by verbal interference? Evidence from the verbal description of movement.
AU  - Xie T
AU  -  Wang L
AU  -  Wang T.
PY  - 2021
JO  - Memory
DO  - 10.1080/09658211.2021.1944217
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2021.1944217
ER  -

APA

T, X., L, W., & T., W. (2021). In which case is working memory for movements affected by verbal interference? Evidence from the verbal description of movement.. Memory. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2021.1944217

Source records

europe-pmc · retrieved 2026-09-26T17:36:13.606Z