How do participants feel about the ethics of rich false memory studies?
- DOI
- 10.1080/09658211.2023.2170417
- Published
- 2023 Apr
- Container
- Memory (Hove, England)
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1080/09658211.2023.2170417,
title = {How do participants feel about the ethics of rich false memory studies?},
author = {Murphy G and Maher J and Ballantyne L and Barrett E and Cowman CS and Dawson CA and Huston C and Ryan KM and Greene CM},
year = {2023},
journal = {Memory (Hove, England)},
doi = {10.1080/09658211.2023.2170417},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2023.2170417}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - How do participants feel about the ethics of rich false memory studies? AU - Murphy G AU - Maher J AU - Ballantyne L AU - Barrett E AU - Cowman CS AU - Dawson CA AU - Huston C AU - Ryan KM AU - Greene CM PY - 2023 JO - Memory (Hove, England) DO - 10.1080/09658211.2023.2170417 UR - https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2023.2170417 ER -
APA
G, M., J, M., L, B., E, B., CS, C., CA, D., C, H., KM, R., & CM, G. (2023). How do participants feel about the ethics of rich false memory studies?. Memory (Hove, England). https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2023.2170417
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-25T11:57:26.863Z