How do participants feel about the ethics of rich false memory studies?
- DOI
- 10.1080/09658211.2023.2170417
- Published
- 2023-01-23
- Container
- Memory
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- supportingDOI registered: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- supportingDOI resolves: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- supportingMetadata completeness: All 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1080/09658211.2023.2170417,
title = {How do participants feel about the ethics of rich false memory studies?},
author = {Gillian Murphy and Julie Maher and Lisa Ballantyne and Elizabeth Barrett and Conor S. Cowman and Caroline A. Dawson and Charlotte Huston and Katie M. Ryan and Ciara M. Greene},
year = {2023},
journal = {Memory},
doi = {10.1080/09658211.2023.2170417},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2023.2170417}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - How do participants feel about the ethics of rich false memory studies? AU - Gillian Murphy AU - Julie Maher AU - Lisa Ballantyne AU - Elizabeth Barrett AU - Conor S. Cowman AU - Caroline A. Dawson AU - Charlotte Huston AU - Katie M. Ryan AU - Ciara M. Greene PY - 2023 JO - Memory DO - 10.1080/09658211.2023.2170417 UR - https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2023.2170417 ER -
APA
Murphy, G., Maher, J., Ballantyne, L., Barrett, E., Cowman, C. S., Dawson, C. A., Huston, C., Ryan, K. M., & Greene, C. M. (2023). How do participants feel about the ethics of rich false memory studies?. Memory. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2023.2170417
Source records
- crossref · retrieved 2026-11-10T13:07:09.553Z