A Critical Review of Analytical Methods for Rocuronium Quantification: Comparative Evaluation of Eco-Friendliness, Applicability and Performance.
- DOI
- 10.1080/10408347.2026.2655911
- Published
- 2026 Apr 11
- Container
- Critical reviews in analytical chemistry
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1080/10408347.2026.2655911,
title = {A Critical Review of Analytical Methods for Rocuronium Quantification: Comparative Evaluation of Eco-Friendliness, Applicability and Performance.},
author = {El-Maraghy CM and Abdelmaksoud MM and Abdulhalim SR and Mohamed NM and Ibrahim SS},
year = {2026},
journal = {Critical reviews in analytical chemistry},
doi = {10.1080/10408347.2026.2655911},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1080/10408347.2026.2655911}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - A Critical Review of Analytical Methods for Rocuronium Quantification: Comparative Evaluation of Eco-Friendliness, Applicability and Performance. AU - El-Maraghy CM AU - Abdelmaksoud MM AU - Abdulhalim SR AU - Mohamed NM AU - Ibrahim SS PY - 2026 JO - Critical reviews in analytical chemistry DO - 10.1080/10408347.2026.2655911 UR - https://doi.org/10.1080/10408347.2026.2655911 ER -
APA
CM, E., MM, A., SR, A., NM, M., & SS, I. (2026). A Critical Review of Analytical Methods for Rocuronium Quantification: Comparative Evaluation of Eco-Friendliness, Applicability and Performance.. Critical reviews in analytical chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408347.2026.2655911
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-26T20:28:21.227Z