When psychological science fails to be heard: the lack of evidence-based arguments in a ministerial report on child sexual abuse.

Dodier O, Tomas F

Open source

DOI
10.1080/13218719.2018.1506716
Published
2019
Container
Psychiatry, psychology, and law : an interdisciplinary journal of the Australian and New Zealand Association of Psychiatry, Psychology and Law
Publisher
Not recorded
Open access
yes

Credibility signals

limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1080/13218719.2018.1506716,
  title = {When psychological science fails to be heard: the lack of evidence-based arguments in a ministerial report on child sexual abuse.},
  author = {Dodier O and Tomas F},
  year = {2019},
  journal = {Psychiatry, psychology, and law : an interdisciplinary journal of the Australian and New Zealand Association of Psychiatry, Psychology and Law},
  doi = {10.1080/13218719.2018.1506716},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2018.1506716}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - When psychological science fails to be heard: the lack of evidence-based arguments in a ministerial report on child sexual abuse.
AU  - Dodier O
AU  - Tomas F
PY  - 2019
JO  - Psychiatry, psychology, and law : an interdisciplinary journal of the Australian and New Zealand Association of Psychiatry, Psychology and Law
DO  - 10.1080/13218719.2018.1506716
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2018.1506716
ER  - 

APA

O, D., & F, T. (2019). When psychological science fails to be heard: the lack of evidence-based arguments in a ministerial report on child sexual abuse.. Psychiatry, psychology, and law : an interdisciplinary journal of the Australian and New Zealand Association of Psychiatry, Psychology and Law. https://doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2018.1506716

Source records