Differential effects of direct and cross examination on mock jurors' perceptions and memory in cases of child sexual abuse.
- DOI
- 10.1080/13218719.2020.1742239
- Published
- 2020
- Container
- Psychiatry, psychology, and law : an interdisciplinary journal of the Australian and New Zealand Association of Psychiatry, Psychology and Law
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- yes
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1080/13218719.2020.1742239,
title = {Differential effects of direct and cross examination on mock jurors' perceptions and memory in cases of child sexual abuse.},
author = {Olaguez AP and Klemfuss JZ},
year = {2020},
journal = {Psychiatry, psychology, and law : an interdisciplinary journal of the Australian and New Zealand Association of Psychiatry, Psychology and Law},
doi = {10.1080/13218719.2020.1742239},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2020.1742239}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Differential effects of direct and cross examination on mock jurors' perceptions and memory in cases of child sexual abuse. AU - Olaguez AP AU - Klemfuss JZ PY - 2020 JO - Psychiatry, psychology, and law : an interdisciplinary journal of the Australian and New Zealand Association of Psychiatry, Psychology and Law DO - 10.1080/13218719.2020.1742239 UR - https://doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2020.1742239 ER -
APA
AP, O., & JZ, K. (2020). Differential effects of direct and cross examination on mock jurors' perceptions and memory in cases of child sexual abuse.. Psychiatry, psychology, and law : an interdisciplinary journal of the Australian and New Zealand Association of Psychiatry, Psychology and Law. https://doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2020.1742239
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-11-10T13:35:48.207Z