Commentary on the controversies, challenges, and missteps of the Minnesota Guidelines process from the perspective of the Steering Committee.
- DOI
- 10.1080/13854046.2026.2642997
- Published
- 2026 Mar 16
- Container
- The Clinical neuropsychologist
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- no
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1080/13854046.2026.2642997,
title = {Commentary on the controversies, challenges, and missteps of the Minnesota Guidelines process from the perspective of the Steering Committee.},
author = {Reyes A and Bordes Edgar V and Penna S and Correia S and Bristow T and Whiteside DM and Stringer AY and Fuchs K},
year = {2026},
journal = {The Clinical neuropsychologist},
doi = {10.1080/13854046.2026.2642997},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2026.2642997}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Commentary on the controversies, challenges, and missteps of the Minnesota Guidelines process from the perspective of the Steering Committee. AU - Reyes A AU - Bordes Edgar V AU - Penna S AU - Correia S AU - Bristow T AU - Whiteside DM AU - Stringer AY AU - Fuchs K PY - 2026 JO - The Clinical neuropsychologist DO - 10.1080/13854046.2026.2642997 UR - https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2026.2642997 ER -
APA
A, R., V, B. E., S, P., S, C., T, B., DM, W., AY, S., & K, F. (2026). Commentary on the controversies, challenges, and missteps of the Minnesota Guidelines process from the perspective of the Steering Committee.. The Clinical neuropsychologist. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2026.2642997
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-26T03:25:15.276Z
- europe-pmc · retrieved 2026-09-26T03:25:15.276Z