Do they work, and are they worth it? Proposing a framework of evidence synthesis for guiding the evidence-based use of add-ons in in vitro fertilisation.
- DOI
- 10.1080/14647273.2026.2696818
- Published
- 2026 Dec
- Container
- Human fertility (Cambridge, England)
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1080/14647273.2026.2696818,
title = {Do they work, and are they worth it? Proposing a framework of evidence synthesis for guiding the evidence-based use of add-ons in in vitro fertilisation.},
author = {Hou L and Feng Q and Mazi M and Lensen S and Maheshwari A and Mol BW},
year = {2026},
journal = {Human fertility (Cambridge, England)},
doi = {10.1080/14647273.2026.2696818},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1080/14647273.2026.2696818}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Do they work, and are they worth it? Proposing a framework of evidence synthesis for guiding the evidence-based use of add-ons in in vitro fertilisation. AU - Hou L AU - Feng Q AU - Mazi M AU - Lensen S AU - Maheshwari A AU - Mol BW PY - 2026 JO - Human fertility (Cambridge, England) DO - 10.1080/14647273.2026.2696818 UR - https://doi.org/10.1080/14647273.2026.2696818 ER -
APA
L, H., Q, F., M, M., S, L., A, M., & BW, M. (2026). Do they work, and are they worth it? Proposing a framework of evidence synthesis for guiding the evidence-based use of add-ons in in vitro fertilisation.. Human fertility (Cambridge, England). https://doi.org/10.1080/14647273.2026.2696818
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-25T17:59:36.432Z