Two decades of metacognitive training for psychosis: successes, setbacks, and innovations.
- DOI
- 10.1080/14737175.2025.2483204
- Published
- 2025 May
- Container
- Expert review of neurotherapeutics
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1080/14737175.2025.2483204,
title = {Two decades of metacognitive training for psychosis: successes, setbacks, and innovations.},
author = {Moritz S and Balzan RP and Menon M and Rojahn KM and Schlechte M and Veckenstedt R and Schöttle D and Meinhart A},
year = {2025},
journal = {Expert review of neurotherapeutics},
doi = {10.1080/14737175.2025.2483204},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1080/14737175.2025.2483204}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Two decades of metacognitive training for psychosis: successes, setbacks, and innovations. AU - Moritz S AU - Balzan RP AU - Menon M AU - Rojahn KM AU - Schlechte M AU - Veckenstedt R AU - Schöttle D AU - Meinhart A PY - 2025 JO - Expert review of neurotherapeutics DO - 10.1080/14737175.2025.2483204 UR - https://doi.org/10.1080/14737175.2025.2483204 ER -
APA
S, M., RP, B., M, M., KM, R., M, S., R, V., D, S., & A, M. (2025). Two decades of metacognitive training for psychosis: successes, setbacks, and innovations.. Expert review of neurotherapeutics. https://doi.org/10.1080/14737175.2025.2483204
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-26T07:11:13.894Z