Improving the data quality of spontaneous ADR reports: a practical example from Malta.
- DOI
- 10.1080/14740338.2022.1993820
- Published
- 2022 Feb
- Container
- Expert opinion on drug safety
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1080/14740338.2022.1993820,
title = {Improving the data quality of spontaneous ADR reports: a practical example from Malta.},
author = {Zuccarelli M and Micallef B and Butler D and Serracino-Inglott A and Borg JJ},
year = {2022},
journal = {Expert opinion on drug safety},
doi = {10.1080/14740338.2022.1993820},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1080/14740338.2022.1993820}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Improving the data quality of spontaneous ADR reports: a practical example from Malta. AU - Zuccarelli M AU - Micallef B AU - Butler D AU - Serracino-Inglott A AU - Borg JJ PY - 2022 JO - Expert opinion on drug safety DO - 10.1080/14740338.2022.1993820 UR - https://doi.org/10.1080/14740338.2022.1993820 ER -
APA
M, Z., B, M., D, B., A, S., & JJ, B. (2022). Improving the data quality of spontaneous ADR reports: a practical example from Malta.. Expert opinion on drug safety. https://doi.org/10.1080/14740338.2022.1993820
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-26T00:53:12.475Z