Mistaking Conscience for Control: Why Institutional Conscience Claims are an Unethical Gambit

Bryanna Moore, Marjorie Hodges Shaw

Open source

DOI
10.1080/15265161.2026.2675913
Published
2026-06-22
Container
The American Journal of Bioethics
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Open access
unknown

Credibility signals

uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1080/15265161.2026.2675913,
  title = {Mistaking Conscience for Control: Why Institutional Conscience Claims are an Unethical Gambit},
  author = {Bryanna Moore and Marjorie Hodges Shaw},
  year = {2026},
  journal = {The American Journal of Bioethics},
  doi = {10.1080/15265161.2026.2675913},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2026.2675913}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Mistaking Conscience for Control: Why Institutional Conscience Claims are an Unethical Gambit
AU  - Bryanna Moore
AU  - Marjorie Hodges Shaw
PY  - 2026
JO  - The American Journal of Bioethics
DO  - 10.1080/15265161.2026.2675913
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2026.2675913
ER  - 

APA

Moore, B., & Shaw, M. H. (2026). Mistaking Conscience for Control: Why Institutional Conscience Claims are an Unethical Gambit. The American Journal of Bioethics. https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2026.2675913

Source records