Situating Personal Utility Amidst Creeping Concerns: Response to Open Peer Commentaries on "The Concept of Personal Utility in Genomic Testing: Three Ethical Tensions".
- DOI
- 10.1080/15265161.2026.2718379
- Published
- 2026-08-18
- Container
- Am J Bioeth
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- no
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1080/15265161.2026.2718379,
title = {Situating Personal Utility Amidst Creeping Concerns: Response to Open Peer Commentaries on "The Concept of Personal Utility in Genomic Testing: Three Ethical Tensions".},
author = {John Watts G and Newson AJ.},
year = {2026},
journal = {Am J Bioeth},
doi = {10.1080/15265161.2026.2718379},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2026.2718379}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Situating Personal Utility Amidst Creeping Concerns: Response to Open Peer Commentaries on "The Concept of Personal Utility in Genomic Testing: Three Ethical Tensions". AU - John Watts G AU - Newson AJ. PY - 2026 JO - Am J Bioeth DO - 10.1080/15265161.2026.2718379 UR - https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2026.2718379 ER -
APA
G, J. W., & AJ., N. (2026). Situating Personal Utility Amidst Creeping Concerns: Response to Open Peer Commentaries on "The Concept of Personal Utility in Genomic Testing: Three Ethical Tensions".. Am J Bioeth. https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2026.2718379
Source records
- europe-pmc · retrieved 2026-09-26T00:20:50.349Z