Not all player load equations are equivalent: formula choice alters magnitude and interpretation of optical tracking-derived load in elite football

Andrew J. Callaway, Shelley A. Ellis, Jonathan Williams

Open source

DOI
10.1080/24733938.2026.2756376
Published
2026-11-06
Container
Science and Medicine in Football
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Open access
unknown

Credibility signals

uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1080/24733938.2026.2756376,
  title = {Not all player load equations are equivalent: formula choice alters magnitude and interpretation of optical tracking-derived load in elite football},
  author = {Andrew J. Callaway and Shelley A. Ellis and Jonathan Williams},
  year = {2026},
  journal = {Science and Medicine in Football},
  doi = {10.1080/24733938.2026.2756376},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1080/24733938.2026.2756376}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Not all player load equations are equivalent: formula choice alters magnitude and interpretation of optical tracking-derived load in elite football
AU  - Andrew J. Callaway
AU  - Shelley A. Ellis
AU  - Jonathan Williams
PY  - 2026
JO  - Science and Medicine in Football
DO  - 10.1080/24733938.2026.2756376
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1080/24733938.2026.2756376
ER  - 

APA

Callaway, A. J., Ellis, S. A., & Williams, J. (2026). Not all player load equations are equivalent: formula choice alters magnitude and interpretation of optical tracking-derived load in elite football. Science and Medicine in Football. https://doi.org/10.1080/24733938.2026.2756376

Source records