Comparative life cycle assessment for two structural framing plan alternatives in a composite hybrid steel—cross laminated timber (CLT) building
- DOI
- 10.1088/2634-4505/ae368d
- Published
- 2026-02-02
- Container
- Environmental Research: Infrastructure and Sustainability
- Publisher
- IOP Publishing
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- supportingDOI registered: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- supportingDOI resolves: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- supportingMetadata completeness: All 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1088/2634-4505/ae368d,
title = {Comparative life cycle assessment for two structural framing plan alternatives in a composite hybrid steel—cross laminated timber (CLT) building},
author = {Baiyu Chen and Matthew J Eckelman and Michelle Laboy and Mark D Webster and Jerome F Hajjar},
year = {2026},
journal = {Environmental Research: Infrastructure and Sustainability},
doi = {10.1088/2634-4505/ae368d},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1088/2634-4505/ae368d}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Comparative life cycle assessment for two structural framing plan alternatives in a composite hybrid steel—cross laminated timber (CLT) building AU - Baiyu Chen AU - Matthew J Eckelman AU - Michelle Laboy AU - Mark D Webster AU - Jerome F Hajjar PY - 2026 JO - Environmental Research: Infrastructure and Sustainability DO - 10.1088/2634-4505/ae368d UR - https://doi.org/10.1088/2634-4505/ae368d ER -
APA
Chen, B., Eckelman, M. J., Laboy, M., Webster, M. D., & Hajjar, J. F. (2026). Comparative life cycle assessment for two structural framing plan alternatives in a composite hybrid steel—cross laminated timber (CLT) building. Environmental Research: Infrastructure and Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.1088/2634-4505/ae368d
Source records
- crossref · retrieved 2026-09-25T23:44:44.725Z