Food for thought: A natural language processing analysis of the 2020 Dietary Guidelines publice comments.
- DOI
- 10.1093/ajcn/nqab119
- Published
- 2021 Aug 2
- Container
- The American journal of clinical nutrition
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1093/ajcn/nqab119,
title = {Food for thought: A natural language processing analysis of the 2020 Dietary Guidelines publice comments.},
author = {Lindquist J and Thomas DM and Turner D and Blankenship J and Kyle TK},
year = {2021},
journal = {The American journal of clinical nutrition},
doi = {10.1093/ajcn/nqab119},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/nqab119}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Food for thought: A natural language processing analysis of the 2020 Dietary Guidelines publice comments. AU - Lindquist J AU - Thomas DM AU - Turner D AU - Blankenship J AU - Kyle TK PY - 2021 JO - The American journal of clinical nutrition DO - 10.1093/ajcn/nqab119 UR - https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/nqab119 ER -
APA
J, L., DM, T., D, T., J, B., & TK, K. (2021). Food for thought: A natural language processing analysis of the 2020 Dietary Guidelines publice comments.. The American journal of clinical nutrition. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/nqab119
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-25T12:28:22.636Z