Comparing two-step approaches to measuring gender identity: the reliability and applications of asking about sex assigned at birth vs transgender self-identification.
- DOI
- 10.1093/aje/kwae341
- Published
- 2025 May 7
- Container
- American journal of epidemiology
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- yes
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1093/aje/kwae341,
title = {Comparing two-step approaches to measuring gender identity: the reliability and applications of asking about sex assigned at birth vs transgender self-identification.},
author = {Tordoff DM and Minalga B and Catháin NÓ and Fernandez A and Gross B and Glick SN and The Seattle Trans and Nonbinary Sexual Health (STARS) Advisory Board},
year = {2025},
journal = {American journal of epidemiology},
doi = {10.1093/aje/kwae341},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwae341}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Comparing two-step approaches to measuring gender identity: the reliability and applications of asking about sex assigned at birth vs transgender self-identification. AU - Tordoff DM AU - Minalga B AU - Catháin NÓ AU - Fernandez A AU - Gross B AU - Glick SN AU - The Seattle Trans and Nonbinary Sexual Health (STARS) Advisory Board PY - 2025 JO - American journal of epidemiology DO - 10.1093/aje/kwae341 UR - https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwae341 ER -
APA
DM, T., B, M., NÓ, C., A, F., B, G., SN, G., & Board, T. S. T. A. N. S. H. (. A. (2025). Comparing two-step approaches to measuring gender identity: the reliability and applications of asking about sex assigned at birth vs transgender self-identification.. American journal of epidemiology. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwae341
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-25T16:30:48.487Z