Reply to Seelay: EBRT vs Bronchoscopy for MCAO: apples and oranges are not the same

Roshen Mathew, Nikhil Meena, Levent Dalar

Open source

DOI
10.1093/annalsats/aaoag227
Published
2026-07-30
Container
Annals of the American Thoracic Society
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Open access
unknown

Credibility signals

uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1093/annalsats/aaoag227,
  title = {Reply to Seelay: EBRT vs Bronchoscopy for MCAO: apples and oranges are not the same},
  author = {Roshen Mathew and Nikhil Meena and Levent Dalar},
  year = {2026},
  journal = {Annals of the American Thoracic Society},
  doi = {10.1093/annalsats/aaoag227},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1093/annalsats/aaoag227}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Reply to Seelay: EBRT vs Bronchoscopy for MCAO: apples and oranges are not the same
AU  - Roshen Mathew
AU  - Nikhil Meena
AU  - Levent Dalar
PY  - 2026
JO  - Annals of the American Thoracic Society
DO  - 10.1093/annalsats/aaoag227
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1093/annalsats/aaoag227
ER  - 

APA

Mathew, R., Meena, N., & Dalar, L. (2026). Reply to Seelay: EBRT vs Bronchoscopy for MCAO: apples and oranges are not the same. Annals of the American Thoracic Society. https://doi.org/10.1093/annalsats/aaoag227

Source records