Best practices to evaluate the impact of biomedical research software-metric collection beyond citations.
- DOI
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btae469
- Published
- 2024 Aug 2
- Container
- Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- yes
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1093/bioinformatics/btae469,
title = {Best practices to evaluate the impact of biomedical research software-metric collection beyond citations.},
author = {Afiaz A and Ivanov AA and Chamberlin J and Hanauer D and Savonen CL and Goldman MJ and Morgan M and Reich M and Getka A and Holmes A and Pati S and Knight D and Boutros PC and Bakas S and Caporaso JG and Del Fiol G and Hochheiser H and Haas B and Schloss PD and Eddy JA and Albrecht J and Fedorov A and Waldron L and Hoffman AM and Bradshaw RL and Leek JT and Wright C},
year = {2024},
journal = {Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)},
doi = {10.1093/bioinformatics/btae469},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btae469}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Best practices to evaluate the impact of biomedical research software-metric collection beyond citations. AU - Afiaz A AU - Ivanov AA AU - Chamberlin J AU - Hanauer D AU - Savonen CL AU - Goldman MJ AU - Morgan M AU - Reich M AU - Getka A AU - Holmes A AU - Pati S AU - Knight D AU - Boutros PC AU - Bakas S AU - Caporaso JG AU - Del Fiol G AU - Hochheiser H AU - Haas B AU - Schloss PD AU - Eddy JA AU - Albrecht J AU - Fedorov A AU - Waldron L AU - Hoffman AM AU - Bradshaw RL AU - Leek JT AU - Wright C PY - 2024 JO - Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) DO - 10.1093/bioinformatics/btae469 UR - https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btae469 ER -
APA
A, A., AA, I., J, C., D, H., CL, S., MJ, G., M, M., M, R., A, G., A, H., S, P., D, K., PC, B., S, B., JG, C., G, D. F., H, H., B, H., PD, S., JA, E., J, A., A, F., L, W., AM, H., RL, B., JT, L., & C, W. (2024). Best practices to evaluate the impact of biomedical research software-metric collection beyond citations.. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England). https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btae469
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-26T17:29:25.298Z