RETRACTED: Volume replacement in the surgical patient—does the type of solution make a difference?

J. Boldt

DOI: 10.1093/bja/84.6.783
Published: 2000-06
Container: British Journal of Anaesthesia
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Open access: unknown

Credibility signals

serious concern Score 29/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

supportingDOI registered: A matching record was returned by Crossref. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
supportingDOI resolves: A matching record was returned by Crossref. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility. Source: DOAJ; license: CC0
not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
serious concernRetraction Watch retraction: 1 retraction notice matched this DOI. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
supportingMetadata completeness: All 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1093/bja/84.6.783,
  title = {RETRACTED: Volume replacement in the surgical patient—does the type of solution make a difference?},
  author = {J. Boldt},
  year = {2000},
  journal = {British Journal of Anaesthesia},
  doi = {10.1093/bja/84.6.783},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/84.6.783}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - RETRACTED: Volume replacement in the surgical patient—does the type of solution make a difference?
AU  - J. Boldt
PY  - 2000
JO  - British Journal of Anaesthesia
DO  - 10.1093/bja/84.6.783
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/84.6.783
ER  -

APA

Boldt, J. (2000). RETRACTED: Volume replacement in the surgical patient—does the type of solution make a difference?. British Journal of Anaesthesia. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/84.6.783

Source records

crossref · retrieved 2026-09-24T16:57:57.120Z