Comparison of response criteria in palliative radiotherapy for bleeding gastric cancer: A secondary analysis of the JROSG 17-3 multicenter prospective observational study.
- DOI
- 10.1093/bjr/tqag196
- Published
- 2026 Aug 21
- Container
- The British journal of radiology
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1093/bjr/tqag196,
title = {Comparison of response criteria in palliative radiotherapy for bleeding gastric cancer: A secondary analysis of the JROSG 17-3 multicenter prospective observational study.},
author = {Koide Y and Saito T and Kosugi T and Nakamura N and Takahashi T and Kawamoto T and Utsumi N and Sekii S and Wada H and Tonari A and Ogawa H and Mitsuhashi N and Yamada K and Ito K and Araki N and Nozaki M and Heianna J and Murotani K and Hirano Y and Satoh A and Onoe T and Shikama N},
year = {2026},
journal = {The British journal of radiology},
doi = {10.1093/bjr/tqag196},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1093/bjr/tqag196}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Comparison of response criteria in palliative radiotherapy for bleeding gastric cancer: A secondary analysis of the JROSG 17-3 multicenter prospective observational study. AU - Koide Y AU - Saito T AU - Kosugi T AU - Nakamura N AU - Takahashi T AU - Kawamoto T AU - Utsumi N AU - Sekii S AU - Wada H AU - Tonari A AU - Ogawa H AU - Mitsuhashi N AU - Yamada K AU - Ito K AU - Araki N AU - Nozaki M AU - Heianna J AU - Murotani K AU - Hirano Y AU - Satoh A AU - Onoe T AU - Shikama N PY - 2026 JO - The British journal of radiology DO - 10.1093/bjr/tqag196 UR - https://doi.org/10.1093/bjr/tqag196 ER -
APA
Y, K., T, S., T, K., N, N., T, T., T, K., N, U., S, S., H, W., A, T., H, O., N, M., K, Y., K, I., N, A., M, N., J, H., K, M., Y, H., A, S., T, O., & N, S. (2026). Comparison of response criteria in palliative radiotherapy for bleeding gastric cancer: A secondary analysis of the JROSG 17-3 multicenter prospective observational study.. The British journal of radiology. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjr/tqag196
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-26T13:49:20.931Z