Medico-legal considerations in post-mortem imaging data: governance, ethics, and evidential use

Natasha Davendralingam, Susan C Shelmerdine, Amy-Lee Brookes, Imogen Jones

Open source

DOI: 10.1093/bjro/tzag002
Published: 2026-01
Container: BJR|Open
Publisher: Oxford University Press (OUP)
Open access: unknown

Credibility signals

uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

supportingDOI registered: A matching record was returned by Crossref. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
supportingDOI resolves: A matching record was returned by Crossref. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility. Source: DOAJ; license: CC0
not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
supportingMetadata completeness: All 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1093/bjro/tzag002,
  title = {Medico-legal considerations in post-mortem imaging data: governance, ethics, and evidential use},
  author = {Natasha Davendralingam and Susan C Shelmerdine and Amy-Lee Brookes and Imogen Jones},
  year = {2026},
  journal = {BJR|Open},
  doi = {10.1093/bjro/tzag002},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1093/bjro/tzag002}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Medico-legal considerations in post-mortem imaging data: governance, ethics, and evidential use
AU  - Natasha Davendralingam
AU  - Susan C Shelmerdine
AU  - Amy-Lee Brookes
AU  - Imogen Jones
PY  - 2026
JO  - BJR|Open
DO  - 10.1093/bjro/tzag002
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1093/bjro/tzag002
ER  -

APA

Davendralingam, N., Shelmerdine, S. C., Brookes, A., & Jones, I. (2026). Medico-legal considerations in post-mortem imaging data: governance, ethics, and evidential use. BJR|Open. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjro/tzag002

Source records

crossref · retrieved 2026-11-10T08:58:59.460Z