ESC vs. ACC/AHA Guidelines for Non-Invasive Imaging in Chronic Coronary Disease: Guideline Discordance, Gaps, and Future Directions.

Bader A, Elsherbini A, An KR, Einstein AJ, Tam DY

Open source

DOI
10.1093/ehjci/jeag259
Published
2026 Sep 16
Container
European heart journal. Cardiovascular Imaging
Publisher
Not recorded
Open access
unknown

Credibility signals

limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1093/ehjci/jeag259,
  title = {ESC vs. ACC/AHA Guidelines for Non-Invasive Imaging in Chronic Coronary Disease: Guideline Discordance, Gaps, and Future Directions.},
  author = {Bader A and Elsherbini A and An KR and Einstein AJ and Tam DY},
  year = {2026},
  journal = {European heart journal. Cardiovascular Imaging},
  doi = {10.1093/ehjci/jeag259},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jeag259}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - ESC vs. ACC/AHA Guidelines for Non-Invasive Imaging in Chronic Coronary Disease: Guideline Discordance, Gaps, and Future Directions.
AU  - Bader A
AU  - Elsherbini A
AU  - An KR
AU  - Einstein AJ
AU  - Tam DY
PY  - 2026
JO  - European heart journal. Cardiovascular Imaging
DO  - 10.1093/ehjci/jeag259
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jeag259
ER  - 

APA

A, B., A, E., KR, A., AJ, E., & DY, T. (2026). ESC vs. ACC/AHA Guidelines for Non-Invasive Imaging in Chronic Coronary Disease: Guideline Discordance, Gaps, and Future Directions.. European heart journal. Cardiovascular Imaging. https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jeag259

Source records