MAGGIC and PREDICT-HF Models in the VICTOR Trial: Do Traditional Risk Scores Still Work in Well-Treated Ambulatory Patients with HFrEF?

Senni M, Butler J, Cyr D, Anstrom KJ, Barash I, Bonaca MP, Budoff M, Cho MC, Crespo-Leiro MG, Corda S, Ezekowitz J, Lam CSP, Lewis EF, Lindenfeld J, McMullan CJ, Mentz RJ, O'Connor CM, Ponikowski P, Reddy YNV, Rosano G, Saldarriaga C, Udelson J, Vazquez-Tanus J, Voors AA, Zannad F, VICTOR Study Group

Open source

DOI: 10.1093/ejhf/xuag297
Published: 2026 Sep 21
Container: European journal of heart failure
Publisher: Not recorded
Open access: unknown

Credibility signals

limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility. Source: DOAJ; license: CC0
not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1093/ejhf/xuag297,
  title = {MAGGIC and PREDICT-HF Models in the VICTOR Trial: Do Traditional Risk Scores Still Work in Well-Treated Ambulatory Patients with HFrEF?},
  author = {Senni M and Butler J and Cyr D and Anstrom KJ and Barash I and Bonaca MP and Budoff M and Cho MC and Crespo-Leiro MG and Corda S and Ezekowitz J and Lam CSP and Lewis EF and Lindenfeld J and McMullan CJ and Mentz RJ and O'Connor CM and Ponikowski P and Reddy YNV and Rosano G and Saldarriaga C and Udelson J and Vazquez-Tanus J and Voors AA and Zannad F and VICTOR Study Group},
  year = {2026},
  journal = {European journal of heart failure},
  doi = {10.1093/ejhf/xuag297},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1093/ejhf/xuag297}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - MAGGIC and PREDICT-HF Models in the VICTOR Trial: Do Traditional Risk Scores Still Work in Well-Treated Ambulatory Patients with HFrEF?
AU  - Senni M
AU  - Butler J
AU  - Cyr D
AU  - Anstrom KJ
AU  - Barash I
AU  - Bonaca MP
AU  - Budoff M
AU  - Cho MC
AU  - Crespo-Leiro MG
AU  - Corda S
AU  - Ezekowitz J
AU  - Lam CSP
AU  - Lewis EF
AU  - Lindenfeld J
AU  - McMullan CJ
AU  - Mentz RJ
AU  - O'Connor CM
AU  - Ponikowski P
AU  - Reddy YNV
AU  - Rosano G
AU  - Saldarriaga C
AU  - Udelson J
AU  - Vazquez-Tanus J
AU  - Voors AA
AU  - Zannad F
AU  - VICTOR Study Group
PY  - 2026
JO  - European journal of heart failure
DO  - 10.1093/ejhf/xuag297
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1093/ejhf/xuag297
ER  -

APA

M, S., J, B., D, C., KJ, A., I, B., MP, B., M, B., MC, C., MG, C., S, C., J, E., CSP, L., EF, L., J, L., CJ, M., RJ, M., CM, O., P, P., YNV, R., G, R., C, S., J, U., J, V., AA, V., F, Z., & Group, V. S. (2026). MAGGIC and PREDICT-HF Models in the VICTOR Trial: Do Traditional Risk Scores Still Work in Well-Treated Ambulatory Patients with HFrEF?. European journal of heart failure. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejhf/xuag297

Source records

pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-25T21:24:00.062Z