Relapse and failure rates between CAD/CAM and conventional fixed retainers: a 2-year follow-up of a randomized controlled clinical trial.

Tran G, Rucker R, Foley P, Bankhead B, Adel SM, Kim KB

Open source

DOI
10.1093/ejo/cjad079
Published
2024 Jan 1
Container
European journal of orthodontics
Publisher
Not recorded
Open access
unknown

Credibility signals

limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1093/ejo/cjad079,
  title = {Relapse and failure rates between CAD/CAM and conventional fixed retainers: a 2-year follow-up of a randomized controlled clinical trial.},
  author = {Tran G and Rucker R and Foley P and Bankhead B and Adel SM and Kim KB},
  year = {2024},
  journal = {European journal of orthodontics},
  doi = {10.1093/ejo/cjad079},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjad079}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Relapse and failure rates between CAD/CAM and conventional fixed retainers: a 2-year follow-up of a randomized controlled clinical trial.
AU  - Tran G
AU  - Rucker R
AU  - Foley P
AU  - Bankhead B
AU  - Adel SM
AU  - Kim KB
PY  - 2024
JO  - European journal of orthodontics
DO  - 10.1093/ejo/cjad079
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjad079
ER  - 

APA

G, T., R, R., P, F., B, B., SM, A., & KB, K. (2024). Relapse and failure rates between CAD/CAM and conventional fixed retainers: a 2-year follow-up of a randomized controlled clinical trial.. European journal of orthodontics. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjad079

Source records