Reporting quality and risk of bias in systematic reviews of clinical prediction models: a cross-sectional overview of 1004 studies
- DOI
- 10.1093/epirev/mxag013
- Published
- 2026-09-15
- Container
- Epidemiologic Reviews
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- supportingDOI registered: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- supportingDOI resolves: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- supportingMetadata completeness: All 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1093/epirev/mxag013,
title = {Reporting quality and risk of bias in systematic reviews of clinical prediction models: a cross-sectional overview of 1004 studies},
author = {Mei Zhang and Yunhui Xia and Hangfeng Mo and Yujia Zhu and Leyi Fang and Qianyu Xiang and Jiantong Shen and Li Wang and Jianlin Lou},
year = {2026},
journal = {Epidemiologic Reviews},
doi = {10.1093/epirev/mxag013},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1093/epirev/mxag013}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Reporting quality and risk of bias in systematic reviews of clinical prediction models: a cross-sectional overview of 1004 studies AU - Mei Zhang AU - Yunhui Xia AU - Hangfeng Mo AU - Yujia Zhu AU - Leyi Fang AU - Qianyu Xiang AU - Jiantong Shen AU - Li Wang AU - Jianlin Lou PY - 2026 JO - Epidemiologic Reviews DO - 10.1093/epirev/mxag013 UR - https://doi.org/10.1093/epirev/mxag013 ER -
APA
Zhang, M., Xia, Y., Mo, H., Zhu, Y., Fang, L., Xiang, Q., Shen, J., Wang, L., & Lou, J. (2026). Reporting quality and risk of bias in systematic reviews of clinical prediction models: a cross-sectional overview of 1004 studies. Epidemiologic Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1093/epirev/mxag013
Source records
- crossref · retrieved 2026-09-25T04:34:53.497Z