Comparative analysis of randomized versus real-world populations in heart failure: DIAMOND trial vs CARE-HK registry.
- DOI
- 10.1093/eschf/xvag155
- Published
- 2026 May 5
- Container
- ESC heart failure
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- yes
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1093/eschf/xvag155,
title = {Comparative analysis of randomized versus real-world populations in heart failure: DIAMOND trial vs CARE-HK registry.},
author = {Fabien S and Fioretti F and Donachie V and Obergfell A and Butler J and Anker SD and Greene SJ and Sauer AJ},
year = {2026},
journal = {ESC heart failure},
doi = {10.1093/eschf/xvag155},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1093/eschf/xvag155}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Comparative analysis of randomized versus real-world populations in heart failure: DIAMOND trial vs CARE-HK registry. AU - Fabien S AU - Fioretti F AU - Donachie V AU - Obergfell A AU - Butler J AU - Anker SD AU - Greene SJ AU - Sauer AJ PY - 2026 JO - ESC heart failure DO - 10.1093/eschf/xvag155 UR - https://doi.org/10.1093/eschf/xvag155 ER -
APA
S, F., F, F., V, D., A, O., J, B., SD, A., SJ, G., & AJ, S. (2026). Comparative analysis of randomized versus real-world populations in heart failure: DIAMOND trial vs CARE-HK registry.. ESC heart failure. https://doi.org/10.1093/eschf/xvag155
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-26T03:22:04.778Z