Response to “Perhaps Fewer, but Faster: Should we Rethink the 90% Stroke Unit Admission Standard?”
- DOI
- 10.1093/esj/aakag059
- Published
- 2026-09
- Container
- European Stroke Journal
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- supportingDOI registered: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- supportingDOI resolves: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- supportingMetadata completeness: All 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1093/esj/aakag059,
title = {Response to “Perhaps Fewer, but Faster: Should we Rethink the 90\% Stroke Unit Admission Standard?”},
author = {Aleš Tomek and Melinda Berg Roaldsen and Bjorn Logi Thórarinsson and Arlene Wilkie and Francesca Romana Pezzella and Hanne Christensen},
year = {2026},
journal = {European Stroke Journal},
doi = {10.1093/esj/aakag059},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1093/esj/aakag059}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Response to “Perhaps Fewer, but Faster: Should we Rethink the 90% Stroke Unit Admission Standard?” AU - Aleš Tomek AU - Melinda Berg Roaldsen AU - Bjorn Logi Thórarinsson AU - Arlene Wilkie AU - Francesca Romana Pezzella AU - Hanne Christensen PY - 2026 JO - European Stroke Journal DO - 10.1093/esj/aakag059 UR - https://doi.org/10.1093/esj/aakag059 ER -
APA
Tomek, A., Roaldsen, M. B., Thórarinsson, B. L., Wilkie, A., Pezzella, F. R., & Christensen, H. (2026). Response to “Perhaps Fewer, but Faster: Should we Rethink the 90% Stroke Unit Admission Standard?”. European Stroke Journal. https://doi.org/10.1093/esj/aakag059
Source records
- crossref · retrieved 2026-09-25T14:00:42.564Z