How equitable is social franchising? Case studies of three maternal healthcare franchises in Uganda and India.

Haemmerli M, Santos A, Penn-Kekana L, Lange I, Matovu F, Benova L, Wong KLM, Goodman C

Open source

DOI
10.1093/heapol/czx192
Published
2018 Apr 1
Container
Health policy and planning
Publisher
Not recorded
Open access
yes

Credibility signals

limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1093/heapol/czx192,
  title = {How equitable is social franchising? Case studies of three maternal healthcare franchises in Uganda and India.},
  author = {Haemmerli M and Santos A and Penn-Kekana L and Lange I and Matovu F and Benova L and Wong KLM and Goodman C},
  year = {2018},
  journal = {Health policy and planning},
  doi = {10.1093/heapol/czx192},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czx192}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - How equitable is social franchising? Case studies of three maternal healthcare franchises in Uganda and India.
AU  - Haemmerli M
AU  - Santos A
AU  - Penn-Kekana L
AU  - Lange I
AU  - Matovu F
AU  - Benova L
AU  - Wong KLM
AU  - Goodman C
PY  - 2018
JO  - Health policy and planning
DO  - 10.1093/heapol/czx192
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czx192
ER  - 

APA

M, H., A, S., L, P., I, L., F, M., L, B., KLM, W., & C, G. (2018). How equitable is social franchising? Case studies of three maternal healthcare franchises in Uganda and India.. Health policy and planning. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czx192

Source records