Australia’s proposed gambling reforms may be good for industry, but not for public health

Samantha Thomas, Hannah Pitt, Simone McCarthy, Monique Murray, Mike Daube

Open source

DOI: 10.1093/heapro/daag057
Published: 2026-03-02
Container: Health Promotion International
Publisher: Oxford University Press (OUP)
Open access: unknown

Credibility signals

uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

supportingDOI registered: A matching record was returned by Crossref. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
supportingDOI resolves: A matching record was returned by Crossref. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility. Source: DOAJ; license: CC0
not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
supportingMetadata completeness: All 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1093/heapro/daag057,
  title = {Australia’s proposed gambling reforms may be good for industry, but not for public health},
  author = {Samantha Thomas and Hannah Pitt and Simone McCarthy and Monique Murray and Mike Daube},
  year = {2026},
  journal = {Health Promotion International},
  doi = {10.1093/heapro/daag057},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/daag057}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Australia’s proposed gambling reforms may be good for industry, but not for public health
AU  - Samantha Thomas
AU  - Hannah Pitt
AU  - Simone McCarthy
AU  - Monique Murray
AU  - Mike Daube
PY  - 2026
JO  - Health Promotion International
DO  - 10.1093/heapro/daag057
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/daag057
ER  -

APA

Thomas, S., Pitt, H., McCarthy, S., Murray, M., & Daube, M. (2026). Australia’s proposed gambling reforms may be good for industry, but not for public health. Health Promotion International. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/daag057

Source records

crossref · retrieved 2026-09-25T06:20:01.039Z