Reply: Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence for first trimester dydrogesterone-induced birth defects.

Katalinic A.

Open source

DOI
10.1093/hropen/hoae031
Published
2024-05-11
Container
Hum Reprod Open
Publisher
Not recorded
Open access
yes

Credibility signals

limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1093/hropen/hoae031,
  title = {Reply: Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence for first trimester dydrogesterone-induced birth defects.},
  author = {Katalinic A.},
  year = {2024},
  journal = {Hum Reprod Open},
  doi = {10.1093/hropen/hoae031},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1093/hropen/hoae031}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Reply: Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence for first trimester dydrogesterone-induced birth defects.
AU  - Katalinic A.
PY  - 2024
JO  - Hum Reprod Open
DO  - 10.1093/hropen/hoae031
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1093/hropen/hoae031
ER  - 

APA

A., K. (2024). Reply: Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence for first trimester dydrogesterone-induced birth defects.. Hum Reprod Open. https://doi.org/10.1093/hropen/hoae031

Source records