20 years of the European IVF-monitoring Consortium registry: what have we learned? A comparison with registries from two other regions
- DOI
- 10.1093/humrep/deaa250
- Published
- 2020-11-14
- Container
- Human Reproduction
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- supportingDOI registered: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- supportingDOI resolves: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- supportingMetadata completeness: All 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1093/humrep/deaa250,
title = {20 years of the European IVF-monitoring Consortium registry: what have we learned? A comparison with registries from two other regions},
author = {Ch De Geyter and C Wyns and C Calhaz-Jorge and J de Mouzon and A P Ferraretti and M Kupka and A Nyboe Andersen and K G Nygren and V Goossens},
year = {2020},
journal = {Human Reproduction},
doi = {10.1093/humrep/deaa250},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deaa250}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - 20 years of the European IVF-monitoring Consortium registry: what have we learned? A comparison with registries from two other regions AU - Ch De Geyter AU - C Wyns AU - C Calhaz-Jorge AU - J de Mouzon AU - A P Ferraretti AU - M Kupka AU - A Nyboe Andersen AU - K G Nygren AU - V Goossens PY - 2020 JO - Human Reproduction DO - 10.1093/humrep/deaa250 UR - https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deaa250 ER -
APA
Geyter, C. D., Wyns, C., Calhaz-Jorge, C., Mouzon, J. D., Ferraretti, A. P., Kupka, M., Andersen, A. N., Nygren, K. G., & Goossens, V. (2020). 20 years of the European IVF-monitoring Consortium registry: what have we learned? A comparison with registries from two other regions. Human Reproduction. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deaa250
Source records
- crossref · retrieved 2026-09-26T18:13:48.917Z