Live birth rates after natural cycle versus artificial cycle in women receiving donated oocytes and the impact of female age
- DOI
- 10.1093/humrep/deag058
- Published
- 2026-04-11
- Container
- Human Reproduction
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- supportingDOI registered: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- supportingDOI resolves: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- supportingMetadata completeness: All 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1093/humrep/deag058,
title = {Live birth rates after natural cycle versus artificial cycle in women receiving donated oocytes and the impact of female age},
author = {Filipa Rafael and Beatriz Nunes David and Juan Manuel Mascarós and Ana Neves and Elena Labarta and Nicolas Garrido and Sofia Nunes and Juan A Garcia-Velasco and Sérgio Reis-Soares and Samuel Santos-Ribeiro},
year = {2026},
journal = {Human Reproduction},
doi = {10.1093/humrep/deag058},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deag058}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Live birth rates after natural cycle versus artificial cycle in women receiving donated oocytes and the impact of female age AU - Filipa Rafael AU - Beatriz Nunes David AU - Juan Manuel Mascarós AU - Ana Neves AU - Elena Labarta AU - Nicolas Garrido AU - Sofia Nunes AU - Juan A Garcia-Velasco AU - Sérgio Reis-Soares AU - Samuel Santos-Ribeiro PY - 2026 JO - Human Reproduction DO - 10.1093/humrep/deag058 UR - https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deag058 ER -
APA
Rafael, F., David, B. N., Mascarós, J. M., Neves, A., Labarta, E., Garrido, N., Nunes, S., Garcia-Velasco, J. A., Reis-Soares, S., & Santos-Ribeiro, S. (2026). Live birth rates after natural cycle versus artificial cycle in women receiving donated oocytes and the impact of female age. Human Reproduction. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deag058
Source records
- crossref · retrieved 2026-09-27T05:44:51.307Z