Efficacy, safety and tolerability of progesterone vaginal pessaries versus progesterone vaginal gel for luteal phase support after in vitro fertilisation: a randomised controlled trial.
- DOI
- 10.1093/humrep/dez261
- Published
- 2020 Feb 29
- Container
- Human reproduction (Oxford, England)
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- yes
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1093/humrep/dez261,
title = {Efficacy, safety and tolerability of progesterone vaginal pessaries versus progesterone vaginal gel for luteal phase support after in vitro fertilisation: a randomised controlled trial.},
author = {Saunders H and Khan C and D'Hooghe T and Magnúsdóttir TB and Klingmann I and Hrafnsdóttir S and vaginal progesterone luteal phase support post IVF study group},
year = {2020},
journal = {Human reproduction (Oxford, England)},
doi = {10.1093/humrep/dez261},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dez261}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Efficacy, safety and tolerability of progesterone vaginal pessaries versus progesterone vaginal gel for luteal phase support after in vitro fertilisation: a randomised controlled trial. AU - Saunders H AU - Khan C AU - D'Hooghe T AU - Magnúsdóttir TB AU - Klingmann I AU - Hrafnsdóttir S AU - vaginal progesterone luteal phase support post IVF study group PY - 2020 JO - Human reproduction (Oxford, England) DO - 10.1093/humrep/dez261 UR - https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dez261 ER -
APA
H, S., C, K., T, D., TB, M., I, K., S, H., & group, V. P. L. P. S. P. I. S. (2020). Efficacy, safety and tolerability of progesterone vaginal pessaries versus progesterone vaginal gel for luteal phase support after in vitro fertilisation: a randomised controlled trial.. Human reproduction (Oxford, England). https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dez261
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-27T00:14:03.924Z