Comparing enhanced natural recovery and enhanced natural recovery with activated carbon: a case study in the Lower Duwamish Waterway
- DOI
- 10.1093/inteam/vjaf040
- Published
- 2025-03-22
- Container
- Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- supportingDOI registered: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- supportingDOI resolves: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- supportingMetadata completeness: All 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1093/inteam/vjaf040,
title = {Comparing enhanced natural recovery and enhanced natural recovery with activated carbon: a case study in the Lower Duwamish Waterway},
author = {Victor S Magar and Jason M Conder and Lis Nelis and Debra Williston and Jeff Stern and David Schuchardt and Allison Crowley and Pete D Rude and Joanna Florer and Joseph Flaherty},
year = {2025},
journal = {Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management},
doi = {10.1093/inteam/vjaf040},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1093/inteam/vjaf040}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Comparing enhanced natural recovery and enhanced natural recovery with activated carbon: a case study in the Lower Duwamish Waterway AU - Victor S Magar AU - Jason M Conder AU - Lis Nelis AU - Debra Williston AU - Jeff Stern AU - David Schuchardt AU - Allison Crowley AU - Pete D Rude AU - Joanna Florer AU - Joseph Flaherty PY - 2025 JO - Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management DO - 10.1093/inteam/vjaf040 UR - https://doi.org/10.1093/inteam/vjaf040 ER -
APA
Magar, V. S., Conder, J. M., Nelis, L., Williston, D., Stern, J., Schuchardt, D., Crowley, A., Rude, P. D., Florer, J., & Flaherty, J. (2025). Comparing enhanced natural recovery and enhanced natural recovery with activated carbon: a case study in the Lower Duwamish Waterway. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management. https://doi.org/10.1093/inteam/vjaf040
Source records
- crossref · retrieved 2026-09-27T01:59:36.200Z