Why are PFOS ecological surface water quality criteria so different between countries? A review of differences in regulatory guidance
- DOI
- 10.1093/inteam/vjaf089
- Published
- 2025-07-23
- Container
- Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- supportingDOI registered: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- supportingDOI resolves: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- supportingMetadata completeness: All 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1093/inteam/vjaf089,
title = {Why are PFOS ecological surface water quality criteria so different between countries? A review of differences in regulatory guidance},
author = {Belinda Goldsworthy and Bryant Gagliardi and Betsy Ruffle and Christine Archer and Craig W Davis and Paul Koster Van Groos and Anita Thapalia},
year = {2025},
journal = {Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management},
doi = {10.1093/inteam/vjaf089},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1093/inteam/vjaf089}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Why are PFOS ecological surface water quality criteria so different between countries? A review of differences in regulatory guidance AU - Belinda Goldsworthy AU - Bryant Gagliardi AU - Betsy Ruffle AU - Christine Archer AU - Craig W Davis AU - Paul Koster Van Groos AU - Anita Thapalia PY - 2025 JO - Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management DO - 10.1093/inteam/vjaf089 UR - https://doi.org/10.1093/inteam/vjaf089 ER -
APA
Goldsworthy, B., Gagliardi, B., Ruffle, B., Archer, C., Davis, C. W., Groos, P. K. V., & Thapalia, A. (2025). Why are PFOS ecological surface water quality criteria so different between countries? A review of differences in regulatory guidance. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management. https://doi.org/10.1093/inteam/vjaf089
Source records
- crossref · retrieved 2026-09-26T18:41:25.357Z