Reconciling differences between EUCAST 'breakpoint-defining doses' and UK national antimicrobial treatment guidelines.
- DOI
- 10.1093/jac/dkag315
- Published
- 2026 Sep 1
- Container
- The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- yes
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1093/jac/dkag315,
title = {Reconciling differences between EUCAST 'breakpoint-defining doses' and UK national antimicrobial treatment guidelines.},
author = {Jamieson C and Boyd SE and Wootton M and Livermore DM and Hand K and Macgowan AP and Howe RA and BSAC Standing Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing},
year = {2026},
journal = {The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy},
doi = {10.1093/jac/dkag315},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkag315}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Reconciling differences between EUCAST 'breakpoint-defining doses' and UK national antimicrobial treatment guidelines. AU - Jamieson C AU - Boyd SE AU - Wootton M AU - Livermore DM AU - Hand K AU - Macgowan AP AU - Howe RA AU - BSAC Standing Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing PY - 2026 JO - The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy DO - 10.1093/jac/dkag315 UR - https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkag315 ER -
APA
C, J., SE, B., M, W., DM, L., K, H., AP, M., RA, H., & Testing, B. S. C. O. A. S. (2026). Reconciling differences between EUCAST 'breakpoint-defining doses' and UK national antimicrobial treatment guidelines.. The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkag315
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-26T15:08:24.175Z