Comparing human and animal antimicrobial usage: a critical appraisal of the indicators used is needed.

Sanders P, van Geijlswijk I, Bonten M, Mughini-Gras L, van Hout J, Heederik D

Open source

DOI
10.1093/jacamr/dlae005
Published
2024 Feb
Container
JAC-antimicrobial resistance
Publisher
Not recorded
Open access
yes

Credibility signals

limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1093/jacamr/dlae005,
  title = {Comparing human and animal antimicrobial usage: a critical appraisal of the indicators used is needed.},
  author = {Sanders P and van Geijlswijk I and Bonten M and Mughini-Gras L and van Hout J and Heederik D},
  year = {2024},
  journal = {JAC-antimicrobial resistance},
  doi = {10.1093/jacamr/dlae005},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1093/jacamr/dlae005}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Comparing human and animal antimicrobial usage: a critical appraisal of the indicators used is needed.
AU  - Sanders P
AU  - van Geijlswijk I
AU  - Bonten M
AU  - Mughini-Gras L
AU  - van Hout J
AU  - Heederik D
PY  - 2024
JO  - JAC-antimicrobial resistance
DO  - 10.1093/jacamr/dlae005
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1093/jacamr/dlae005
ER  - 

APA

P, S., I, V. G., M, B., L, M., J, V. H., & D, H. (2024). Comparing human and animal antimicrobial usage: a critical appraisal of the indicators used is needed.. JAC-antimicrobial resistance. https://doi.org/10.1093/jacamr/dlae005

Source records