Can reproducibility be improved in clinical natural language processing? A study of 7 clinical NLP suites.

Digan W, Névéol A, Neuraz A, Wack M, Baudoin D, Burgun A, Rance B

Open source

DOI
10.1093/jamia/ocaa261
Published
2021 Mar 1
Container
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA
Publisher
Not recorded
Open access
yes

Credibility signals

limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1093/jamia/ocaa261,
  title = {Can reproducibility be improved in clinical natural language processing? A study of 7 clinical NLP suites.},
  author = {Digan W and Névéol A and Neuraz A and Wack M and Baudoin D and Burgun A and Rance B},
  year = {2021},
  journal = {Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA},
  doi = {10.1093/jamia/ocaa261},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocaa261}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Can reproducibility be improved in clinical natural language processing? A study of 7 clinical NLP suites.
AU  - Digan W
AU  - Névéol A
AU  - Neuraz A
AU  - Wack M
AU  - Baudoin D
AU  - Burgun A
AU  - Rance B
PY  - 2021
JO  - Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA
DO  - 10.1093/jamia/ocaa261
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocaa261
ER  - 

APA

W, D., A, N., A, N., M, W., D, B., A, B., & B, R. (2021). Can reproducibility be improved in clinical natural language processing? A study of 7 clinical NLP suites.. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA. https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocaa261

Source records