A model of evaluative opinion to encourage greater transparency and justification of interpretation in postmortem forensic toxicology

Peter D Maskell, Simon Elliott, Brigitte Desharnais, Martin Findell, Graham Jackson

Open source

DOI
10.1093/jat/bkad055
Published
2023-08-11
Container
Journal of Analytical Toxicology
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Open access
unknown

Credibility signals

uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1093/jat/bkad055,
  title = {A model of evaluative opinion to encourage greater transparency and justification of interpretation in postmortem forensic toxicology},
  author = {Peter D Maskell and Simon Elliott and Brigitte Desharnais and Martin Findell and Graham Jackson},
  year = {2023},
  journal = {Journal of Analytical Toxicology},
  doi = {10.1093/jat/bkad055},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1093/jat/bkad055}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - A model of evaluative opinion to encourage greater transparency and justification of interpretation in postmortem forensic toxicology
AU  - Peter D Maskell
AU  - Simon Elliott
AU  - Brigitte Desharnais
AU  - Martin Findell
AU  - Graham Jackson
PY  - 2023
JO  - Journal of Analytical Toxicology
DO  - 10.1093/jat/bkad055
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1093/jat/bkad055
ER  - 

APA

Maskell, P. D., Elliott, S., Desharnais, B., Findell, M., & Jackson, G. (2023). A model of evaluative opinion to encourage greater transparency and justification of interpretation in postmortem forensic toxicology. Journal of Analytical Toxicology. https://doi.org/10.1093/jat/bkad055

Source records