Forensic bitemark identification: weak foundations, exaggerated claims.
- DOI
- 10.1093/jlb/lsw045
- Published
- 2016 Dec
- Container
- Journal of law and the biosciences
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- yes
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1093/jlb/lsw045,
title = {Forensic bitemark identification: weak foundations, exaggerated claims.},
author = {Saks MJ and Albright T and Bohan TL and Bierer BE and Bowers CM and Bush MA and Bush PJ and Casadevall A and Cole SA and Denton MB and Diamond SS and Dioso-Villa R and Epstein J and Faigman D and Faigman L and Fienberg SE and Garrett BL and Giannelli PC and Greely HT and Imwinkelried E and Jamieson A and Kafadar K and Kassirer JP and Koehler J' and Korn D and Mnookin J and Morrison AB and Murphy E and Peerwani N and Peterson JL and Risinger DM and Sensabaugh GF and Spiegelman C and Stern H and Thompson WC and Wayman JL and Zabell S and Zumwalt RE},
year = {2016},
journal = {Journal of law and the biosciences},
doi = {10.1093/jlb/lsw045},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1093/jlb/lsw045}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Forensic bitemark identification: weak foundations, exaggerated claims. AU - Saks MJ AU - Albright T AU - Bohan TL AU - Bierer BE AU - Bowers CM AU - Bush MA AU - Bush PJ AU - Casadevall A AU - Cole SA AU - Denton MB AU - Diamond SS AU - Dioso-Villa R AU - Epstein J AU - Faigman D AU - Faigman L AU - Fienberg SE AU - Garrett BL AU - Giannelli PC AU - Greely HT AU - Imwinkelried E AU - Jamieson A AU - Kafadar K AU - Kassirer JP AU - Koehler J' AU - Korn D AU - Mnookin J AU - Morrison AB AU - Murphy E AU - Peerwani N AU - Peterson JL AU - Risinger DM AU - Sensabaugh GF AU - Spiegelman C AU - Stern H AU - Thompson WC AU - Wayman JL AU - Zabell S AU - Zumwalt RE PY - 2016 JO - Journal of law and the biosciences DO - 10.1093/jlb/lsw045 UR - https://doi.org/10.1093/jlb/lsw045 ER -
APA
MJ, S., T, A., TL, B., BE, B., CM, B., MA, B., PJ, B., A, C., SA, C., MB, D., SS, D., R, D., J, E., D, F., L, F., SE, F., BL, G., PC, G., HT, G., E, I., A, J., K, K., JP, K., J', K., D, K., J, M., AB, M., E, M., N, P., JL, P., DM, R., GF, S., C, S., H, S., WC, T., JL, W., S, Z., & RE, Z. (2016). Forensic bitemark identification: weak foundations, exaggerated claims.. Journal of law and the biosciences. https://doi.org/10.1093/jlb/lsw045
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-25T20:39:25.132Z