The (mis)use of fetal viability as the determinant of non-criminal abortion in the Netherlands and England and Wales.

Halliday S, Romanis EC, de Proost L, Verweij EJ

DOI: 10.1093/medlaw/fwad015
Published: 2023 Nov 27
Container: Medical law review
Publisher: Not recorded
Open access: yes

Credibility signals

limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility. Source: DOAJ; license: CC0
not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1093/medlaw/fwad015,
  title = {The (mis)use of fetal viability as the determinant of non-criminal abortion in the Netherlands and England and Wales.},
  author = {Halliday S and Romanis EC and de Proost L and Verweij EJ},
  year = {2023},
  journal = {Medical law review},
  doi = {10.1093/medlaw/fwad015},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1093/medlaw/fwad015}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - The (mis)use of fetal viability as the determinant of non-criminal abortion in the Netherlands and England and Wales.
AU  - Halliday S
AU  - Romanis EC
AU  - de Proost L
AU  - Verweij EJ
PY  - 2023
JO  - Medical law review
DO  - 10.1093/medlaw/fwad015
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1093/medlaw/fwad015
ER  -

APA

S, H., EC, R., L, D. P., & EJ, V. (2023). The (mis)use of fetal viability as the determinant of non-criminal abortion in the Netherlands and England and Wales.. Medical law review. https://doi.org/10.1093/medlaw/fwad015

Source records

pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-27T00:43:07.608Z