An Analysis of Arguments Advanced via Twitter in an Advocacy Campaign to Promote Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems
- DOI
- 10.1093/ntr/ntac237
- Published
- 2022-10-21
- Container
- Nicotine & Tobacco Research
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- supportingDOI registered: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- supportingDOI resolves: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- supportingMetadata completeness: All 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1093/ntr/ntac237,
title = {An Analysis of Arguments Advanced via Twitter in an Advocacy Campaign to Promote Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems},
author = {Ell Lee and Janet Hoek and Elizabeth Fenton and Ayush Joshi and Karen Evans-Reeves and Lindsay Robertson},
year = {2022},
journal = {Nicotine \& Tobacco Research},
doi = {10.1093/ntr/ntac237},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntac237}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - An Analysis of Arguments Advanced via Twitter in an Advocacy Campaign to Promote Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems AU - Ell Lee AU - Janet Hoek AU - Elizabeth Fenton AU - Ayush Joshi AU - Karen Evans-Reeves AU - Lindsay Robertson PY - 2022 JO - Nicotine & Tobacco Research DO - 10.1093/ntr/ntac237 UR - https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntac237 ER -
APA
Lee, E., Hoek, J., Fenton, E., Joshi, A., Evans-Reeves, K., & Robertson, L. (2022). An Analysis of Arguments Advanced via Twitter in an Advocacy Campaign to Promote Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems. Nicotine & Tobacco Research. https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntac237
Source records
- crossref · retrieved 2026-09-26T15:32:59.862Z