Who Should Decide the Outcome for a Clinical Trial? Comparing the Views of Stakeholders on Intervention Benefit Using Multi-Criteria Decision Modelling of Cognitive Remediation
- DOI
- 10.1093/schbul/sbag006
- Published
- 2026-04-10
- Container
- Schizophrenia Bulletin
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- supportingDOI registered: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- supportingDOI resolves: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- supportingMetadata completeness: All 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1093/schbul/sbag006,
title = {Who Should Decide the Outcome for a Clinical Trial? Comparing the Views of Stakeholders on Intervention Benefit Using Multi-Criteria Decision Modelling of Cognitive Remediation},
author = {Xiaoyu Zhang and Til Wykes and Huajie Jin and Dominic Stringer and Andrew Pickles and Matteo Cella and Alex Kenny and Emese Csipke and Imogen Kilcoyne and Jesus Perez and Uzma Zahid and Jonathan Wilson and Max Birchwood and Rose Tinch-Taylor and Rosa Ritunnano and Eileen Joyce},
year = {2026},
journal = {Schizophrenia Bulletin},
doi = {10.1093/schbul/sbag006},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbag006}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Who Should Decide the Outcome for a Clinical Trial? Comparing the Views of Stakeholders on Intervention Benefit Using Multi-Criteria Decision Modelling of Cognitive Remediation AU - Xiaoyu Zhang AU - Til Wykes AU - Huajie Jin AU - Dominic Stringer AU - Andrew Pickles AU - Matteo Cella AU - Alex Kenny AU - Emese Csipke AU - Imogen Kilcoyne AU - Jesus Perez AU - Uzma Zahid AU - Jonathan Wilson AU - Max Birchwood AU - Rose Tinch-Taylor AU - Rosa Ritunnano AU - Eileen Joyce PY - 2026 JO - Schizophrenia Bulletin DO - 10.1093/schbul/sbag006 UR - https://doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbag006 ER -
APA
Zhang, X., Wykes, T., Jin, H., Stringer, D., Pickles, A., Cella, M., Kenny, A., Csipke, E., Kilcoyne, I., Perez, J., Zahid, U., Wilson, J., Birchwood, M., Tinch-Taylor, R., Ritunnano, R., & Joyce, E. (2026). Who Should Decide the Outcome for a Clinical Trial? Comparing the Views of Stakeholders on Intervention Benefit Using Multi-Criteria Decision Modelling of Cognitive Remediation. Schizophrenia Bulletin. https://doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbag006
Source records
- crossref · retrieved 2026-09-25T08:06:11.023Z