Openness and Computational Reproducibility in Plant Pathology: Where We Stand and a Way Forward.

Sparks AH, Ponte EMD, Alves KS, Foster ZSL, Grünwald NJ

Open source

DOI
10.1094/phyto-10-21-0430-per
Published
2023 Jul
Container
Phytopathology
Publisher
Not recorded
Open access
unknown

Credibility signals

limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1094/phyto-10-21-0430-per,
  title = {Openness and Computational Reproducibility in Plant Pathology: Where We Stand and a Way Forward.},
  author = {Sparks AH and Ponte EMD and Alves KS and Foster ZSL and Grünwald NJ},
  year = {2023},
  journal = {Phytopathology},
  doi = {10.1094/phyto-10-21-0430-per},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1094/phyto-10-21-0430-per}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Openness and Computational Reproducibility in Plant Pathology: Where We Stand and a Way Forward.
AU  - Sparks AH
AU  - Ponte EMD
AU  - Alves KS
AU  - Foster ZSL
AU  - Grünwald NJ
PY  - 2023
JO  - Phytopathology
DO  - 10.1094/phyto-10-21-0430-per
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1094/phyto-10-21-0430-per
ER  - 

APA

AH, S., EMD, P., KS, A., ZSL, F., & NJ, G. (2023). Openness and Computational Reproducibility in Plant Pathology: Where We Stand and a Way Forward.. Phytopathology. https://doi.org/10.1094/phyto-10-21-0430-per

Source records