Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses

Matthew E. Falagas, Eleni I. Pitsouni, George A. Malietzis, Georgios Pappas

Open source

DOI
10.1096/fj.07-9492lsf
Published
2007-09-20
Container
The FASEB Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Open access
unknown

Credibility signals

uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1096/fj.07-9492lsf,
  title = {Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses},
  author = {Matthew E. Falagas and Eleni I. Pitsouni and George A. Malietzis and Georgios Pappas},
  year = {2007},
  journal = {The FASEB Journal},
  doi = {10.1096/fj.07-9492lsf},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.07-9492lsf}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses
AU  - Matthew E. Falagas
AU  - Eleni I. Pitsouni
AU  - George A. Malietzis
AU  - Georgios Pappas
PY  - 2007
JO  - The FASEB Journal
DO  - 10.1096/fj.07-9492lsf
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.07-9492lsf
ER  - 

APA

Falagas, M. E., Pitsouni, E. I., Malietzis, G. A., & Pappas, G. (2007). Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses. The FASEB Journal. https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.07-9492lsf

Source records