Traditional versus new needle retractable i.v. catheters in children: are they really safer, and whom are they protecting?
- DOI
- 10.1097/00000539-200302000-00016
- Published
- 2003 Feb
- Container
- Anesthesia and analgesia
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1097/00000539-200302000-00016,
title = {Traditional versus new needle retractable i.v. catheters in children: are they really safer, and whom are they protecting?},
author = {Coté CJ and Roth AG and Wheeler M and ter Rahe C and Rae BR and Dsida RM and Przybylo HJ},
year = {2003},
journal = {Anesthesia and analgesia},
doi = {10.1097/00000539-200302000-00016},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1097/00000539-200302000-00016}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Traditional versus new needle retractable i.v. catheters in children: are they really safer, and whom are they protecting? AU - Coté CJ AU - Roth AG AU - Wheeler M AU - ter Rahe C AU - Rae BR AU - Dsida RM AU - Przybylo HJ PY - 2003 JO - Anesthesia and analgesia DO - 10.1097/00000539-200302000-00016 UR - https://doi.org/10.1097/00000539-200302000-00016 ER -
APA
CJ, C., AG, R., M, W., C, T. R., BR, R., RM, D., & HJ, P. (2003). Traditional versus new needle retractable i.v. catheters in children: are they really safer, and whom are they protecting?. Anesthesia and analgesia. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000539-200302000-00016
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-26T02:13:43.884Z