How and why internal medicine clerkship directors use locally developed, faculty-written examinations: results of a national survey.
- DOI
- 10.1097/acm.0b013e318258351b
- Published
- 2012 Jul
- Container
- Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1097/acm.0b013e318258351b,
title = {How and why internal medicine clerkship directors use locally developed, faculty-written examinations: results of a national survey.},
author = {Kelly WF and Papp KK and Torre D and Hemmer PA},
year = {2012},
journal = {Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges},
doi = {10.1097/acm.0b013e318258351b},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1097/acm.0b013e318258351b}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - How and why internal medicine clerkship directors use locally developed, faculty-written examinations: results of a national survey. AU - Kelly WF AU - Papp KK AU - Torre D AU - Hemmer PA PY - 2012 JO - Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges DO - 10.1097/acm.0b013e318258351b UR - https://doi.org/10.1097/acm.0b013e318258351b ER -
APA
WF, K., KK, P., D, T., & PA, H. (2012). How and why internal medicine clerkship directors use locally developed, faculty-written examinations: results of a national survey.. Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges. https://doi.org/10.1097/acm.0b013e318258351b
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-25T19:15:20.974Z