High Positive End-expiratory Pressure (PEEP) with Recruitment Maneuvers versus Low PEEP during General Anesthesia for Surgery: A Bayesian Individual Patient Data Meta-analysis of Three Randomized Clinical Trials

Guido Mazzinari, Fernando G. Zampieri, Lorenzo Ball, Niklas S. Campos, Thomas Bluth, Sabrine N. T. Hemmes, Carlos Ferrando, Julian Librero, Marina Soro, Paolo Pelosi, Marcelo Gama de Abreu, Marcus J. Schultz, Ary Serpa Neto, Unknown

Open source

DOI: 10.1097/aln.0000000000005170
Published: 2024-07-22
Container: Anesthesiology
Publisher: Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Open access: unknown

Credibility signals

uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

supportingDOI registered: A matching record was returned by Crossref. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
supportingDOI resolves: A matching record was returned by Crossref. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility. Source: DOAJ; license: CC0
not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
supportingMetadata completeness: All 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1097/aln.0000000000005170,
  title = {High Positive End-expiratory Pressure (PEEP) with Recruitment Maneuvers versus Low PEEP during General Anesthesia for Surgery: A Bayesian Individual Patient Data Meta-analysis of Three Randomized Clinical Trials},
  author = {Guido Mazzinari and Fernando G. Zampieri and Lorenzo Ball and Niklas S. Campos and Thomas Bluth and Sabrine N. T. Hemmes and Carlos Ferrando and Julian Librero and Marina Soro and Paolo Pelosi and Marcelo Gama de Abreu and Marcus J. Schultz and Ary Serpa Neto and Unknown},
  year = {2024},
  journal = {Anesthesiology},
  doi = {10.1097/aln.0000000000005170},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1097/aln.0000000000005170}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - High Positive End-expiratory Pressure (PEEP) with Recruitment Maneuvers versus Low PEEP during General Anesthesia for Surgery: A Bayesian Individual Patient Data Meta-analysis of Three Randomized Clinical Trials
AU  - Guido Mazzinari
AU  - Fernando G. Zampieri
AU  - Lorenzo Ball
AU  - Niklas S. Campos
AU  - Thomas Bluth
AU  - Sabrine N. T. Hemmes
AU  - Carlos Ferrando
AU  - Julian Librero
AU  - Marina Soro
AU  - Paolo Pelosi
AU  - Marcelo Gama de Abreu
AU  - Marcus J. Schultz
AU  - Ary Serpa Neto
AU  - Unknown
PY  - 2024
JO  - Anesthesiology
DO  - 10.1097/aln.0000000000005170
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1097/aln.0000000000005170
ER  -

APA

Mazzinari, G., Zampieri, F. G., Ball, L., Campos, N. S., Bluth, T., Hemmes, S. N. T., Ferrando, C., Librero, J., Soro, M., Pelosi, P., Abreu, M. G. D., Schultz, M. J., Neto, A. S., & Unknown (2024). High Positive End-expiratory Pressure (PEEP) with Recruitment Maneuvers versus Low PEEP during General Anesthesia for Surgery: A Bayesian Individual Patient Data Meta-analysis of Three Randomized Clinical Trials. Anesthesiology. https://doi.org/10.1097/aln.0000000000005170

Source records

crossref · retrieved 2026-11-10T19:55:50.260Z