Active Versus Passive Transcutaneous Bone Conduction Hearing Devices: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis [RETRACTED]

David Forner, Christopher W. Noel, Peter Horwich, Paul Hong, Nael Shoman

Open source

DOI
10.1097/aud.0000000000001088
Published
2021-06-29
Container
Ear & Hearing
Publisher
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Open access
unknown

Credibility signals

serious concern Score 29/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1097/aud.0000000000001088,
  title = {Active Versus Passive Transcutaneous Bone Conduction Hearing Devices: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis [RETRACTED]},
  author = {David Forner and Christopher W. Noel and Peter Horwich and Paul Hong and Nael Shoman},
  year = {2021},
  journal = {Ear \& Hearing},
  doi = {10.1097/aud.0000000000001088},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1097/aud.0000000000001088}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Active Versus Passive Transcutaneous Bone Conduction Hearing Devices: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis [RETRACTED]
AU  - David Forner
AU  - Christopher W. Noel
AU  - Peter Horwich
AU  - Paul Hong
AU  - Nael Shoman
PY  - 2021
JO  - Ear & Hearing
DO  - 10.1097/aud.0000000000001088
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1097/aud.0000000000001088
ER  - 

APA

Forner, D., Noel, C. W., Horwich, P., Hong, P., & Shoman, N. (2021). Active Versus Passive Transcutaneous Bone Conduction Hearing Devices: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis [RETRACTED]. Ear & Hearing. https://doi.org/10.1097/aud.0000000000001088

Source records