Richard III's Scoliosis Revisited: A Comment on the Reliability of Historical Sources.
- DOI
- 10.1097/brs.0000000000004766
- Published
- 2023 Dec 1
- Container
- Spine
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1097/brs.0000000000004766,
title = {Richard III's Scoliosis Revisited: A Comment on the Reliability of Historical Sources.},
author = {Galassi FM and Habicht ME and Varotto E and Smith DL},
year = {2023},
journal = {Spine},
doi = {10.1097/brs.0000000000004766},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1097/brs.0000000000004766}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Richard III's Scoliosis Revisited: A Comment on the Reliability of Historical Sources. AU - Galassi FM AU - Habicht ME AU - Varotto E AU - Smith DL PY - 2023 JO - Spine DO - 10.1097/brs.0000000000004766 UR - https://doi.org/10.1097/brs.0000000000004766 ER -
APA
FM, G., ME, H., E, V., & DL, S. (2023). Richard III's Scoliosis Revisited: A Comment on the Reliability of Historical Sources.. Spine. https://doi.org/10.1097/brs.0000000000004766
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-26T16:17:59.557Z