High-Flow Nasal Cannula Compared With Conventional Oxygen Therapy or Noninvasive Ventilation Immediately Postextubation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
- DOI
- 10.1097/ccm.0000000000004576
- Published
- 2020 Nov
- Container
- Critical care medicine
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1097/ccm.0000000000004576,
title = {High-Flow Nasal Cannula Compared With Conventional Oxygen Therapy or Noninvasive Ventilation Immediately Postextubation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.},
author = {Granton D and Chaudhuri D and Wang D and Einav S and Helviz Y and Mauri T and Mancebo J and Frat JP and Jog S and Hernandez G and Maggiore SM and Hodgson CL and Jaber S and Brochard L and Trivedi V and Ricard JD and Goligher EC and Burns KEA and Rochwerg B},
year = {2020},
journal = {Critical care medicine},
doi = {10.1097/ccm.0000000000004576},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1097/ccm.0000000000004576}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - High-Flow Nasal Cannula Compared With Conventional Oxygen Therapy or Noninvasive Ventilation Immediately Postextubation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. AU - Granton D AU - Chaudhuri D AU - Wang D AU - Einav S AU - Helviz Y AU - Mauri T AU - Mancebo J AU - Frat JP AU - Jog S AU - Hernandez G AU - Maggiore SM AU - Hodgson CL AU - Jaber S AU - Brochard L AU - Trivedi V AU - Ricard JD AU - Goligher EC AU - Burns KEA AU - Rochwerg B PY - 2020 JO - Critical care medicine DO - 10.1097/ccm.0000000000004576 UR - https://doi.org/10.1097/ccm.0000000000004576 ER -
APA
D, G., D, C., D, W., S, E., Y, H., T, M., J, M., JP, F., S, J., G, H., SM, M., CL, H., S, J., L, B., V, T., JD, R., EC, G., KEA, B., & B, R. (2020). High-Flow Nasal Cannula Compared With Conventional Oxygen Therapy or Noninvasive Ventilation Immediately Postextubation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.. Critical care medicine. https://doi.org/10.1097/ccm.0000000000004576
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-11-10T16:30:41.208Z